Wednesday, August 17, 2011

SITCOMS

Before Americans loved Lucy, they loved Molly.

Yes, the first television show that was referred to as a sitcom in print (TV Guide, 1953) was “I Love Lucy,” but “The Goldbergs,” a sitcom by nature, if not yet by name, aired two years before the Ricardos showed the world that the power of absurdity shouldnt be underestimated (or, for that matter, Mencken). Originally called “The Rise of the Goldbergs,” this Bronx-based, family-centered, Depression-era situation comedy starred Molly Goldberg played by Gertrude Berg, a now forgotten media pioneer (not unlike her exact contemporary Irna Phillips, see SOAP OPERAS), who happened to conceive, write and produce the whole deal.

Gertrude Berg was her stage name. Tilly (soon-to-be Tillie) Edelstein was her real name. (As you’ll see, she liked taking on new personas.)

Tillie’s father owned Fleischmanns, one of the many hotels located in upstate New York’s Catskill Mountains. By the turn of the century, the Catskills—not too far from or too close to New York City—had become a favorite with recent Jewish immigrants, who were yearning to breathe some fresh mountain air free from the Lower East Side’s stifling heat and crowded conditions. They were also yearning to avoid the humiliation and disappointment promised by the NO JEWS OR DOGS ALLOWED signs found elsewhere.


Market Day, Jewish Quarter of Lower East Side, 1912,
Courtesy of the New York Public Library, www.nypl.org

The Catskills were accessible by car, train or bus, and its resorts featured nightly entertainment, opportunities for teenage flirtation (see “Dirty Dancing”) and activities for youngsters as well as hot and cold water on each floor, electric lights and telephones—imagine.

Tillie’s father hoped she would run his forty-acre hotel with him someday, not exactly what she had in mind for her future, but she was young enough that she could agree to work with him for the time being, doing the paperwork, keeping the books, reading palms and creating plays to entertain the guests and their cooped up children on rainy days. 

In the summer of 1914—the year Tillie turned sixteen—Lewis Berg came to stay at the hotel. 

Lewis was older, intelligent, sophisticated and supremely self-confident. He was immediately taken with the creative, spirited and intense young girl, who he introduced to the world of culture—art, music, etc. 

As assimilationist Jews with left-leaning political views and boundless curiosity, the two of them had ample common ground. Tillie, for her part, knew instinctively that Lewis was the kind of man who would encourage her to be the kind of woman who did something with her life. Besides, his British accent was exotic. It was one of those rare things: a good match.  

Four years later, Lewis and Tillie made it official—Lewis wanted to wait till Tillie was older—and settled in Manhattan, where their two children, a boy and a girl, would be raised.  

Tillie (Gertrude by then) out with
Lewis, circa 1953,
Courtesy of Sitcoms Online,
http://www.sitcomsonline.com/
Lewis, an industrial engineer, turned out to be more than supportive. Even though he did so well financially that Tillie didn’t have to work, he understood and countenanced her desire for a career of her own. (In fact, for her first gig, a Yiddish Xmas commercial, he wrote out all of her lines phonetically. She spoke no Yiddish.) 

Her daughter, Harriet Berg Schwartz, recalled years later: “She would get up at five in the morning to write a script.... As a child, [my brother and I] were told things like, ‘Don’t disturb your mother, she’s writing.’” Indeed, by 1927, Tillie had crafted two not-so-bad concepts: Effie and Laura about two hip salesgirls, who work at a five and dime (“Sex in the City” before its time) and The Rise of the Goldbergs about a Jewish family living in Depression-era Manhattan. Effie and Laura never took off, but The Rise of the Goldbergs did.

“My sense of my grandmother is that she had kind of a dark childhood, Tillie’s granddaughter, Anne Schwartz, a children’s book publisher, observed. ‘The Goldbergs’ were really this idealized family she wished she had as she was growing up but she didn’t have that family.... After [Tillie]’s brother died her mother, Dinah, was a woman in a deep depression, in continual mourning—a recluse who was slowly losing her mind. ”

 
Devastated by the loss of Tillie’s older brother (who had died many years earlier of diphtheria) and unable to recover, Dinah Edelstein suffered a series of nervous breakdowns and became more and more reclusive, as her condition continued to worsen. She eventually had to be institutionalized. Tillie, who had been very close to her mother, visited once or twice, but after a while, that became too hard for her. She never spoke about it, not even with her grown children.



*            *            *            *           


In late November 1929, a few months after Amos ‘n’ Andy hit the air and only weeks after Black Tuesday and the stock market crash signaled the coming of the “Great Depression,” The Rise of the Goldbergs premiered on NBC radio (the concept of “network” radio itself being only three years old). By then, Tillie had changed her name, and Gertrude Berg was running the show.

—and starring in it. Berg only intended to play the lead until she could find the right actress, but the audience’s response after she had to bow out of the show one night on account of a sore throat wasn’t one that anyone could ignore. The New York Times reported that: “From the time the program signed off at 9:30 until midnight, the switchboard was flooded with calls from listeners demanding to know what happened to Molly Goldberg,” the lead character and Tillie’s new persona (Molly for Maltke, one of the earlier rainy day characters and Gold for Goldstein, her mothers maiden name). Over 100,000 letters soon arrived, asking the same question.

NYPL Central Building,  (ca. 191--192-?)
Courtesy of the New York Public Library,
www.nypl.org
By that time, she had begun to draft her scripts in her morning bath (sometimes) or at the New York Public Library’s main branch on 42nd street (more often), where there were no distractions, like children (though according to some witnesses she herself was a distraction, acting out and vocalizing the roles as she wrote). The thirty-five-page, handwritten scripts (typed up by Lewis) would, over the years, total 12,000. 

Finished by noon (scripts usually took her three or four hours), Berg—helped by her trusted, long-time assistant Fannie Merrill—would rush off to the theater to rehearse for that night’s live performances (—plural; there was a second broadcast for the West Coast). Rewrites were sometimes necessary, but generally speaking, the scripts were thoughtfully conceived (she carried a notebook around all day), well written and timely. 

FDR, Washington D.C., 1934,
Courtesy of the Franklin D. Roosevelt
Library Digital Archives
Berg refused to turn a blind eye to the tumultuous times that surrounded the show from its very inception: the Depression, the ups and downs of FDR’s presidency, the ascent of Adolf Hitler in far-off Germany, the rise of anti-Semitism at home and the role of the home front during World War II. She wove these momentous political events seamlessly (it seemed) into her plots.

(NPR’s Special Correspondent Susan Stamberg tells us: “There’s a wonderful story—I don’t know if its true or not—that FDR said, ‘I wasn’t the one that got us out of the Depression; it was The Goldbergs.’”)

Over the next seventeen years (years that weren’t without challenges: scrambling for sponsors and switching networks, just to name two), The Goldbergs became the second longest running program in radio history behind Amos ‘n’ Andy.

VE Day in Trondheim, 1945,
Photographer: Schrøder
http://www.flickr.com/
(Please note this photo may only be
reused with appropriate attribution.)
But, 1945 was a watershed year for the world and for Gertrude Berg’s world. Roosevelt, who she greatly admired, died, as did her father. The war was over, and according to Procter & Gamble and CBS, so was her show.

Their rationale? The ratings (a practice begun in the late l920’s) were slipping—and perhaps, they were. (It had, after all, been a long run.) But, other factors, undoubtedly, were at play.

As America prepared itself for the Cold War, Berg’s leftist politics were becoming unfashionable, particularly with the conservative corporate sponsors and media moguls, who didn’t exactly adore dealing with this outspoken, shrewd, no-nonsense, well, Jewish woman, including and especially the Jewish execs.

American Family Watching
Television, 1958,
http://en.wikipedia.org/
Berg, if not a workaholic damn close, wouldn’t throw in the towel. She developed other non-Goldberg radio concepts, but none of them went anywhere, so in 1948, she shrugged off the disappointing run (just 156 performances) and the so-so reviews garnered by “Me and Molly” (a Broadway show she created) and adapted it for the “vast wasteland” now looming on the horizon: television. (Anticipating FCC Chairman Newton Minow’s 1961 speech by a decade, Boston University President Dr. Daniel L. Marsh warned the 1950 graduating class: “If the television craze continues with the present level of programs, we are destined to have a nation of morons.”)

Of course, the TV execs were the same guys as the radio execs, and they just werent interested.

“[Gertrude Berg] was no shrinking violet; she was an assertive woman,” observed Brooklyn born fan and future Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. She played the “you owe me after all I’ve done for you” card and got herself an audition, which went so well that CBS premiered “The Goldbergs” in the Monday 9 p.m. time slot.

The New York Times review said it all:

“The Goldbergs came to television last week and the word this morning is that they probably are going to be there for as long as they choose.”

The show (still live) only got better.

Berg, who preferred to act (“Writing is work; acting is fun.”) was a natural—someone who was comfortable in front of the cameras.

“Breaking the fourth wall” (an innovation only hinted at visually fifty years later in “The Office” and “Parks and Rec”), Berg would begin the show by leaning out her window (the one that faced the airshaft) and chatting with the viewer—you:

“Hello is such a little word for such a big feeling. I want to say hello with all the letters of the alphabet.” 


Gertrude Berg as Molly Goldberg,
Courtesy of Sitcoms Online,  http://www.sitcomsonline.com/

If anything the writing was funnier, the lines crisper, the message even more philosophical:

Talking to Uncle David (a supremely well-conceived and -acted character), Molly advises:

“Don’t forget, David, darling. Marriage is just not an express train where you get on at the first station and you get off at the last station. Don’t forget there are local stops in between.

And a phone call—reminiscent of a “Taxi”-like conversation—comes in (a big deal circa l950).

Uncle David (answering the phone): “Its long distance.”

Molly: “How long?”

Berg never lost focus: “The Goldbergs is about family (before “All in the Family”) co-existing in the cramped quarters of an affordable apartment (before “The Honeymooners” moved into Bensonhurst). The heart of that family was a mother-knows-best (before there was a “Father Knows Best”) dispensing advice about the (“Seinfeld”-esque) everyday things of life.

Like most (all?) writers, Gertrude Berg wrote about what she knew: Jewish families. But (like “The Cosby Show” would in years to come), while maintaining her roots she always addressed the universals that concern us all.

Propaganda Comic Book Cover,
Catechetical Guild, 1947,
http://en.wikipedia.org/
In all likelihood, if Philip Loeb, the actor who played Jake, Molly’s TV husband, hadn’t been listed the next year in Red Channels: The Report of Communist Influence in Radio and Television, Jack Gould’s prediction (posited in the New York Times review quoted earlier) that the Goldbergs would be on television “for as long as they [chose]” would have come true. Instead, Gertrude Berg was forced to enter the twilight zone of the Red Scare.

“...an era can be said to end when its basic illusions are exhausted,” was how playwright and soon to be reluctant participant in the modernist remake of the Salem witch trials Arthur Miller put it.

The 213-page booklet, Red Channels listed (alphabetically for handy reference) 151 performers (including many of the great artists of the day), 130 organizations and 17 publications (for good measure) that, according to them, supported communism. 

Cover of Red Channels,
http://en.wikipedia.org
Published as its own entity by Counterattack, or The Newsletter of Facts on Communism, a four-page weekly conceived in 1947 by three former FBI agents, Red Channels was not only sold on newsstands, but also mailed to Counterattack’s never-more-than-7,500 subscribers. Its impact, however, was not driven by how many read it so much as who read it:

“Most copies disappeared quickly into the drawers of executive desks at networks, advertising agencies, and sponsors. Few people discussed its contents openly. If they spoke of it, they seldom mentioned who was listed. Artists, even those listed, seldom saw a copy. Many of those listed did not know about it for weeks.” (Jack Gould, the aforementioned New York Times critic, referred to it as “the bible of Madison Avenue.”)

Walter Bernstein, who was blacklisted (and who would go on to write the scripts Fail-Safe and The Front) remembers that:

“…inclusion in Red Channels…meant automatic blacklisting. No one ever questioned this; it was simply accepted by the networks and the movie studios. There was no government edict behind it, no proof of illegality, moral turpitude or, even worse, lack of talent. If you were in Red Channels, you were blacklisted.”

The concept of the blacklist originated three years earlier with the creation of the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) “…which included a large number of the most unattractive men in American public life-bigots, racists, reactionaries, and sheer buffoons….” who claimed that the film industry was riddled with subversives, parlor pinks, fellow travelers, traitors and spies all hiding in plain sight in Hollywood Hills. Subpoenaed witnesses fell into one of two groups: friendly and unfriendly. The former, like Ronald Reagan and Walt Disney, were happy to cooperate with HUAC; the latter refused to “name names” and out their friends who were suspected of being communists, or of being sympathetic to the communist cause.


"Free the Hollywood 10" Demonstration"
Wisconsin Historical Society, http://www.flickr.com/
(Note: This photo may only be reused with
appropriate attribution.)

“HUAC’s Hollywood forays and the sensitivity of the mass entertainment industry to bad publicity spawned one of the morally questionable aspects of the era.”

Joe 1, First Soviet Atomic Test,
http://en.wikipedia.org/
That was putting it mildly.

And, that was just the start: Hiss v. Chambers, a contest that is debated to this day; the Soviet Union’s detonation of an atomic bomb, with or without secrets leaked by American spies Julius and Ethel Rosenberg (see LYNCH); Mao Tse Tung’s (communist) take-over of the world’s most populous country; and the Korean War were on the horizon.

But, the real action was taking place down in unlikely Wheeling, West Virginia at the even more unlikely Woman’s Republican Club dinner. There, previously justifiably little known Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy told the group that he had in his hand a list of 205 people who were known to be communists and were still working in the federal government—maybe. (According to historian David Oshinsky the only accurate, verbatim transcript—a radio recording of the speech—has been erased. What is known for certain is that McCarthy had no such list.)

Senator Joseph McCarthy, 1954,
Courtesy of Prints and Photographs
Division, Library of Congress,
LC-USZ62-71719
The media smelled blood, or more accurately ink, and it flowed for years as McCarthy, “…lay over the country like one of those disease-ridden blankets that white settlers gave the Indians,” writes Walter Bernstein.
Six months after McCarthy’s Wheeling, West Virginia speech, Philip Loeb’s name appeared in Red Channels.

That was more than enough for The Goldbergs’ sponsor, General Foods, who in an earlier case had made their corporate position clear by issuing a press release that stated:

“The use of controversial personalities or the discussion of controversial subjects in our advertising may provide unfavorable criticism and even antagonism among sizable groups of customers. Such reactions [injure] both acceptance of our products and our public relations. General Foods advertising, therefore, avoids the use of material and personalities which in its judgment are controversial.”

Even though sales of their product were up, General Foods told Gertrude Berg she had two days to get rid of Loeb....
  

Gertrude Berg and Philip Loeb, Courtesy of
Sitcoms Online,
http://www.sitcomsonline.com/

Berg and Loeb, Molly and Jake, had good chemistry, and it came across on the tube. Now that and the show were threatened.

Beyond that, Berg liked Loeb personally, respected his acting ability and sympathized with his political views, many of which she shared. Loeb was a co-founder of The American Federation of Radio Actors—AFRA, soon to be AFTRA—and a vocal member of Actor’s Equity. Through Actor’s Equity, he had fought successfully for rehearsal pay, pensions, medical plans and better working conditions for all performers.

It wasn’t lost on her that Loeb’s union activism was the reason that he was listed in Red Channels.

Berg confronted General Foods and told them she would go public with their threat:

“I will appear on every available platform from coast to coast denouncing General Foods and advising people not to buy its products” (see BOYCOTT).

General Foods backed off but only for a while. Not long after that (in 1951), they withdrew their sponsorship of the show, and CBS cancelled “The Goldbergs.”

Over the next eighteen months, Berg met with CBS and various advertising agencies—to no avail—in the hopes of securing a sponsor who would allow Loeb to stay in the cast.

Trapped, she reluctantly offered Loeb a cash settlement. He refused, on principle. Always feisty and fearless, he wanted to fight back.

Berg and Loeb, Molly and Jake,
Courtesy of Sitcoms Online,
http://www.sitcomsonline.com/
Berg, who considered the practice of blacklisting un-American (“I believe in the American principle that a person is innocent until proven guilty”), supported Loeb:

“Philip Loeb has stated categorically that he is not and never has been a Communist. I believe him. There is no dispute between Philip Loeb and myself.”

Finally, in January 1952, Loeb, debt-ridden, faced with the dilemma of a union man being responsible for a number of people being out of work for eighteen months, relented and accepted a, by now, reduced (by half) settlement.

Broadway producer and friend Bill Ross would later reminisce: 

“When he accepted the money, it was a disgrace. He had to accept it. His son was in a sanitarium and [a friend’s] father was paying the bills. He didn’t want that to continue, but he felt he had sold out…. Phil got more and more depressed.”

Philip Loeb,
http://en.wikipedia.org/
His hard-earned and deservedly successful career was gone—vanished before his disbelieving and now, thanks in part to two cataract operations, failing eyes. He could no longer find work, other than a little something here and there, and the money from the settlement that he had so reluctantly accepted was running out (partly on account of legal expenses). He had to live with friends, at their apartments, and as the sole support of his schizophrenic son, he was facing the task of transferring him from a private facility to a public one.

Broke, broken, bitter, depressed and despondent on September 1, 1955—four years after his ordeal began—after getting his affairs in order, Loeb checked into room 507 at the Taft Hotel using the name Fred Lang (German for ‘forever peace’), made some calls, changed into his pajamas, overdosed on sleeping pills that he had acquired only days earlier and died.

“He’s been hurt so terribly. Now see what they did to him. They took his living away. They took his life away. A person can stand only so much,” Loeb’s sister concluded.

New York Times headquarters
from 1913 to 2007,
http://en.wikipedia.org/
The New York Times, achieving a state of journalistic cowardice that’s become all too common during periods of historical crisis in America, had this to say, in an article buried safely on page 38:

“It could not be ascertained last night, however, whether his [Loeb’s] recent idleness had been because of what he called his ‘blacklisting,’ or whether he had been unable to find work for other reasons.”

Gertrude Berg who was, of course, devastated by the news, would (as with her mother's tragic end) never speak of it.

That same year (1955) the NBC suits forced “The Goldbergs” (with a new actor playing Jake) to move out to the ’burbs, where it would succumb to “death by homogenization.”

“Gertrude Berg did not want to take the show to the suburbs, TV historian Richard Thompson observes, and I wish they would have listened to her because it became a completely different show and it wasn’t good.” So it goes. 

“I Love Lucy,” which debuted October 15, 1951, took the coveted Monday 9 p.m. time slot and in time, became the top-rated show in the country.


But, it wasn’t the ratings so much as the respective methods of recording I Love Lucy and “The Goldsbergs that would make all the difference. The Goldbergs recorded their archival footage by filming the television monitor as the show was on air—a technique known as the kinescope process. “Lucy, on the other hand, filmed the cast live, using three cameras, a technique that would introduce the concept of editing TV. 

The dreadful technical quality of the recordings prevented syndication and ruined any chance The Goldbergs had at re-runs, which is why it does not exist in the consciousness of post-modern America.


The Three Camera Angles, Vitameatavegamin Episode,
"I Love Lucy," 1952, Courtesy of the Dann Cahn Collection, https://www.editorsguild.com/

Worthington Miner, CBS’s manager of program pevelopment back then (whose job involved finding a dramatic show, a variety show, a children’s program and a situation comedy) candidly admitted years later:

Worthington Miner, at microphone
(center), directing "The Missus Goes
A-Shopping,'" CBS Control Room,
1941, Courtesy of Steve Dichter,
http://community.webtv.net/
“I never wanted a live audience for [‘The Goldbergs’] because I thought then that it would be very difficult for people in a studio to concentrate on the actors and get the comedy without becoming interested in the cameras. And I felt that canned applause or laughter was a pretty terrible device. In retrospect I can see that I was probably quite wrong. I think that if we could have encompassed and used the facilities the way they do now in Hollywood, with multiple cameras and a live audience...we could have made ‘The Goldbergs’ into a much-longer-lasting show.”

Gertrude Berg’s support of Philip Loeb (and the attendant negative publicity), her long-time liberal political stances, her consequential exclusion from the small screen and other programs, which were beginning to change (“…[the] key transition in American popular culture is best symbolized by the arrival of father-centered television, a displacement that lasted, more or less, for twenty years.”) all conspired to damage her career. But, as her son-in-law, Dr. A. David Schwartz told us: “Gertrude never wasted time on resentment. She was too smart and too busy, and she wasn’t the kind of person to hold a grudge.”

Indefatigable and indomitable, she persevered. Her first move turned out to be a misstep, an unsuccessful spin-off that was cancelled after a year. In the interim, she made highly paid guest appearances on some of the now popular variety shows and acted in summer stock.  

Antoinette Perry, or "Toni,"
whose name is behind the Tony Award,
www.broadway-theatre-newsletter.com/
But, for Berg, a light was always at the end of the tunnel. Before long, she landed a starring role in Majority of One, a play that ran for 550 performances and earned her a Tony.

All told, her career included being: the first woman to write and produce her own TV show, the creator of the longest (26 years) combined radio/TV series in media history and the first to win a Best Actress Emmy.

As Susan Stamberg observes:

“There were no role models for Gertrude Berg. She just sort of stepped out and did it.  Gertrude Berg was the working woman before feminism, before anything.”


Gertrude Berg at Work, Courtesy of Sitcoms Online,
http://www.sitcomsonline.com/

Decades before the term was coined, Berg 'branded' herself by breaking vaudeville records, starring in a movie and a Broadway play, launching a line of clothes and a comic strip, writing a newspaper column and a cookbook (she had no idea how to cook) and along the way made enough money to live in a five-and-a-half-room Park Avenue duplex and own a 200-year-old, 35-acre country house in northern Westchester. She furnished the house with the antiques she hunted for (when she had time) and served sumptuous meals (indoors and outdoors) accompanied by large helpings of hospitality to the family and friends, who frequently joined her. Her grandson, Adam Berg, joyously remembers: “The best way I can describe my grandmothers house is like Grand Central Station but with food. 

Sounds a little like Fleischmanns, which is where she chose to be buried.


Bibliography

Barnouw, Erik; Tube of Plenty: The Evolution of American Television
Bernstein, Walter; Inside Out: A Memoir of the Blacklist
Castleman, Harry and Walter J. Podrazik; Watching TV: Four Decades of American Television
Ceplair, Larry and Englund, Steve; The Inquisition in Hollywood: Politics in the Film Community 1930–1966
Cogley, John; Report on Blacklisting: II. Radio-Television
Denenberg, Barry; Magical Hystory Tour Interview with Anne Schwartz, August 15, 2011
Fariello, Griffin; Red Scare: Memories of the American Inquisition
Halberstam, David; The Fifties
Haynes, John E.; Red Scare or Red Menace?: American Communism and Anticommunism in the Cold War Era
Howe, Irving; World of Our Fathers
Kempner, Aviva; Yoo-Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg (DVD)
Kisseloff, Jeff; The Box: An Oral History of Television, 1920–1961
Miller, Merle; The Judges and the Judged: The Report on Blacklisting in Radio and Television for the American Civil Liberties Untion
Murrow, Edward R.; “Person to Person Interview,” Yoo-Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg (DVD Bonus Material)
Nachman, Gerald; Raised on Radio
Navasky, Victor S.; Naming Names
Oshinsky, David M.; A Conspiracy So Immense: The World of Joe McCarthy
Schrecker, Ellen; Many are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America
Smith, Glen D., Jr., ; “Something On My Own”: Gertrude Berg and American Broadcasting 1929–1956
Tanenhaus, Sam; Whittaker Chambers: A Biography
Wilk, Max; The Golden Age of Television: Notes from Survivors

“She would…”; Smith, 22
My sense…”; Kempner, DVD
“From the…”; Smith, 35
“Theres a…”; Kempner, DVD
“...vast wasteland...”; Bartlett, 818
“If the television....”; Castleman, 46
“[Gertrude Berg] was no…”; Kempner, DVD
“The Goldbergs came….”; Smith, 119
“Writing is….”; Kempner, DVD
“Hello is….”; Ibid
“Don’t forget….”; Ibid
“It’s long…”; Ibid
“How long?…”; Ibid
“...for as long...”; Smith, 119
“...an era...”; Fariello, 43
“Most copies…”; Barnouw, 125
“…the bible…”; Miller, 41
“…inclusion in…”; Bernstein, 26
“…which included…”; Halberstam, 12
“HUAC’s Hollywood…”; Haynes, 25
“…lay over…”; Bernstein, 201
“The use of….”; Miller, 40
“I will appear….”; Miller, 44
“I believe in….”; Smith, 163
“Philip Loeb…”; New York Times January 25, 1952 Ousted Video Player Gets ‘Goldberg’ Fee, p. 13
“When he…”; Kisselhoff, 426
“He’s been…”; Navasky, 341
“It could…”; New York Times September 2, 1955 Philip Loeb Dead; Prominent Actor, p. 38
“Gertrude Berg did not....”; Kempner, DVD
“I never wanted….”; Wilk, 38
“…[the] key…”; Smith, 190
“Gertrude never….”; Denenberg, Interview with Anne Schwartz
“There were…”; Kempner, DVD
“The best…”; Ibid